SQLite CVSTrac

*** 2,21 ****
  
  ----
  
! 2004-08-08: SQLite would be really useful for me if it supported shared memory databases, so that unlike ':memory', multiple processes could share the same in-memory database. I am currently using Turck MMcache to share data among PHP scripts; if I could use SQLite instead with similar performance it would be really good.
  
       
  ----
  2003-04-15:  The in-memory database is now in the CVS tree, though it is still
  mostly untested.
  
! 2003-05-09:  In-memory databases are now a feature of the standard SQLite library. To open an in-memory database, use filename ":memory:".
  ----
  
! _While connections to on-disk databases should not be carried across a Unix fork(), is there any reason not to do it with an in-memory database?_
  (2003-10-21 by drh:) Not that I know of.
  
! DK: Of course, when you do the fork() you are creating a new copy of the in-memory db for the child process. So subsequent edits to the db in the child won't show up in the parents copy, and vice-versa.
  
  NgPS: Multiple connections to ":memory:" within a single process create a fresh database each time:
  
--- 2,34 ----
  
  ----
  
! <html>2004-09-15: I've written an <a href="http://www.filipdewaard.com/
! 21_SQLite_inmemory_databases.html">article</a> about memory databases in combination with PHP: 
! <a href="http://www.filipdewaard.com/archives/21_SQLite_inmemory_databases.html">SQLite in-
! memory databases</a>.</html>
! 
! ----
! 
! 2004-08-08: SQLite would be really useful for me if it supported shared memory databases, so that 
! unlike ':memory', multiple processes could share the same in-memory database. I am currently using 
! Turck MMcache to share data among PHP scripts; if I could use SQLite instead with similar performance 
! it would be really good.
  
       
  ----
  2003-04-15:  The in-memory database is now in the CVS tree, though it is still
  mostly untested.
  
! 2003-05-09:  In-memory databases are now a feature of the standard SQLite library. To open an in-
! memory database, use filename ":memory:".
  ----
  
! _While connections to on-disk databases should not be carried across a Unix fork(), is there any reason 
! not to do it with an in-memory database?_
  (2003-10-21 by drh:) Not that I know of.
  
! DK: Of course, when you do the fork() you are creating a new copy of the in-memory db for the child 
! process. So subsequent edits to the db in the child won't show up in the parents copy, and vice-versa.
  
  NgPS: Multiple connections to ":memory:" within a single process create a fresh database each time:

sqlite - In Memory Database